Workflowīoth offer exceptionality tight control over much of their associated software.
The same goes for MIDI I/O, which is present on Maschine Mk3 but not Push 2. It’s a fairly basic 2-in, 2-out affair and unlikely to replace your current studio interface, but its inclusion makes Maschine Mk3 far more self-contained. Maschine has a built-in audio interface, too. The drop in brightness is more significant with Push than Maschine, to the point that you’ll likely find yourself wanting to plug Push in whenever possible. Maschine Mk3 and Push 2 support optional power supplies, meaning that both can run solely on USB power, but you’ll need to plug into the mains to get full brightness from the screens and pads. Respect to Korg.Both controllers are very capable in the pad department, although hip-hop heads and those raised on the classic MPC workflow will likely gravitate towards Maschine. I am glad they are keeping it pure.Ĭlearly Korg is smarter than me: The workflow should still be design / discover on the computer version, then package up and load onto SE for performance. I thought Korg might try to incorporate the wavestate into some multiengine giant workstation thing. PI good, FPGA would have been tantalizing.
I had hoped the next gen might be based on a more industrial Arm CPU than the Raspberri Pi (cause we need Pi in the pipeline for kids.) Be interested to see if the Pi is still in there.
(Kind of like the current Waldorf stuff.) I have moved to designing on the virtual wavestate on my computer and realized the bottleneck on my hardware unit is the tiny screen. I have gone back and forth on whether I would want SE type hardware or a aluminum clad, 5″ to 7″ screen, road ready desktop unit as my next wavestate. Out of all of the synths, hardware and virtual, I’ve purchased in the past five years the wavestate has been in a two way heat for most compelling.
0 kommentar(er)
